From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on atuin.qyliss.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from atuin.qyliss.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by atuin.qyliss.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD7B31615; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from atuin.qyliss.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by atuin.qyliss.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E926B315F7 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: addressing architecture.adoc review changes From: "Ville Ilvonen" To: devel@spectrum-os.org Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 06:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <165458472089.1819.1950838469655114894@atuin.qyliss.net> In-Reply-To: <20220607064259.588734-1-ville.ilvonen@unikie.com> References: <20220607064259.588734-1-ville.ilvonen@unikie.com> User-Agent: HyperKitty on https://spectrum-os.org/ Message-ID-Hash: JRX4OVNBN3MHRYYOW6XYAKEVER2IILFF X-Message-ID-Hash: JRX4OVNBN3MHRYYOW6XYAKEVER2IILFF X-MailFrom: ville.ilvonen@unikie.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-config-1; header-match-devel.spectrum-os.org-0; header-match-devel.spectrum-os.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and low-level development discussion Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi, Thanks for the review comments and no worries with delay. People have their schedules. I was just following up on this contrib :-) I was quite not sure how you would have preferred the changes implemented - amended to the original patch or additional patch. I used additional patch. As hard line wrap destroys the diff in respect to the earlier patch I addressed your review comments in the patch comments and used git-send to add the patch. I don't mind amending the changes to the original patch either, just let me know. If there's different preferences, we could complement the contribution guidelines and include style guide. Thanks, -Ville