Re: Enabling forwarding Wayland from appVM to host with waypipe

[Alyssa Ross <alyssa.ross@unikie.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1575 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:32:28PM +0200, Vadim Likholetov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:24 PM Alyssa Ross <alyssa.ross@unikie.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:14:28PM +0200, Vadim Likholetov wrote:
> > > Thank you for the feedback!
> > > I managed to make foot terminal working in my setup -- the issue was in
> > > lack of compositor ( weston in my case) on the guest, looks like it's the
> > > common issue for wayland programs, so now I have competitive advantage
> > over
> > > virtio-gpu setup :)
> >
> > Interesting — why does it need there to be a compositor in the guest?
> > Doesn't Waypipe act as the compositor?
> >
> >   No, why should it?
>   Also wayland-info shows the screen says the display has no compositor.

My understanding of how Waypipe, Sommelier, and wayland-proxy-virtwl
work is that they implement the compositor side of the Wayland protocol,
and then proxy it to the real compositor running outside of the VM.

Since hello-wayland appears on the host, it must be talking to the host
compositor over Waypipe.

It's weird that wayland-info doesn't find a compositor though.
I wonder why, when hello-wayland is able to find it.

> > > I also think that having socket-only approach in Spectrum is not a bad
> > idea
> > > cause it is   enabling remote access and networking  easy for virtual
> > > machines and applications.
> >
> > You mean remote access to Spectrum VMs?
> >
> > Yes, and may be some distributed configurations.

Those would need to use networking, rather than vsock, right?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]