Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Architecture Decision Record

Alyssa Ross
2022-07-12T18:11:50Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 02:02:15PM +0300, Ville Ilvonen wrote:
> * ADRs based on discussions with Alyssa
> * A note on ADRs to architecture.adoc
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Ilvonen <ville.ilvonen@unikie.com>

Hi Ville, thanks for taking the lead on these.

I've been wondering whether it would be better to only take accepted
ADRs into the Spectrum repository, and leave proposed ones for
discussion on the list until they're ready to be accepted. I think that
would make the distinction between them clearer. What do you think?

In future, it would probably also be good for each ADR to be its own
commit, to make them easier to discuss one at a time. (I will add this
to the documentation around submitting patches, when I get a chance to
write it.)

Finally, all the files being added need license and copyright headers.
I'd suggest using the same license as the rest of the documentation.

I'm happy to include at least the accepted ADRs, if the proper headers
are included. You can check all required headers are present by running
`reuse lint` in the Spectrum repository.