Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com> writes:

> diff --git a/host/rootfs/image/etc/s6-rc/systemd-udevd/run b/host/rootfs/image/etc/s6-rc/systemd-udevd/run
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3b74cffe5af191d099ce9314b29669652762092
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/host/rootfs/image/etc/s6-rc/systemd-udevd/run
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +#!/bin/execlineb -P
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: EUPL-1.2+
> +# SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2025 Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
> +s6-setlock /run/sd-notify-wrapper/systemd-udevd.lock
> +# Save stdin to restore it later.

Stray comment.

> +s6-ipcserver-socketbinder -b0 -m -a 0600 /run/sd-notify-wrapper/systemd-udevd.sock
> +background {
> +   fdmove 1 3
> +   sd-notify-adapter
> +}
> +fdclose 3
> +redirfd -r 0 /dev/null
> +export NOTIFY_SOCKET /run/sd-notify-wrapper/systemd-udevd.sock
> +systemd-udevd

> diff --git a/host/rootfs/image/etc/udev/rules.d/99-spectrum.rules b/host/rootfs/image/etc/udev/rules.d/99-spectrum.rules
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6facab361e82fa48e8e018b69b611693b0a277d0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/host/rootfs/image/etc/udev/rules.d/99-spectrum.rules
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: EUPL-1.2+
> +# SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2025 Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
> +
> +ACTION=="remove", GOTO="spectrum-end"
> +ENV{PCI_CLASS}!="2????", GOTO="spectrum-end"
> +
> +# systemd-udevd unsets PATH, so fix that.
> +RUN+="/usr/bin/env PATH=/usr/bin /usr/libexec/net-add"
> +LABEL="spectrum-end"

Would it not be easier to follow without the gotos, where we just have a
single rule that runs net-add when ACTION isn't remove and PCI_CLASS is
as expected?  This structure wouldn't hold up when we handle letting the
VMM know if a device has been removed, because it would have to go after
"spectrum-end", and same if we wanted to handle other types of devices.