patches and low-level development discussion
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Alyssa Ross <hi@alyssa.is>
To: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
Cc: Spectrum OS Development <devel@spectrum-os.org>
Subject: Re: Potential improvements to mount-flatpak
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:17:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zezjtp46.fsf@alyssa.is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bebc170-25cc-4c25-8b93-eef50e0e2685@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1874 bytes --]

Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com> writes:

> I looked at the mount-flatpak codebase and noticed some potential
> improvements for the future:
>
> - The code uses std::fs::write to write to files in the target
>   directory.  This is safe because the VM isn't running, but it might
>   be better to use libpathrs.

I think it's fine.

> - The code doesn't validate the user-provided app ID, resulting in
>   worse error messages than otherwise possible.  App IDs are always
>   D-Bus well-known names, so there is no risk of the rules changing
>   in future versions of Flatpak.

Even though Flatpak 2 won't use D-Bus?

> - Passing something that isn't a flatpak repository as a parameter
>   will result in a confusing "no such file or directory" error.

Could check that if it's cheap, since this is user-facing.  I would not
spend much time on it though, since ultimately this should not be the
interface people use.

> - Various checks for corrupt repositories could be added, such as:
>   - Wrong number of slashes in "current" symlink.
>   - Wrong number of slashes in runtime path.
>   - Bad "active" symlink.

I'm not sure I see the value?  Does normal Flatpak do these checks?
I don't think we need to check everything that could possibly go wrong
if it wouldn't be a security concern.

> - The code that resolves the "active" symlink is duplicated.

I think there's already a patch sitting at the bottom of my inbox for
you from this.

> - The target mount point is not made "noexec".

Sounds like a good improvement.

> - mount_setattr() is called on a directory FD.  I suspect this
>   changes parameters of the source mount.  It might be better to use
>   open_tree_attr() with OPEN_TREE_CLONE instead.

Well, does it change the source mount or doesn't it?  If there's a bug,
fix it; if there isn't, don't.  (I do think you are probably right though.)


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-21 20:16 Potential improvements to mount-flatpak Demi Marie Obenour
2026-07-22  8:17 ` Alyssa Ross [this message]
2026-07-25  6:11   ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-07-27 11:01     ` Alyssa Ross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zezjtp46.fsf@alyssa.is \
    --to=hi@alyssa.is \
    --cc=demiobenour@gmail.com \
    --cc=devel@spectrum-os.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://spectrum-os.org/git/doc
	https://spectrum-os.org/git/mktuntap
	https://spectrum-os.org/git/spectrum
	https://spectrum-os.org/git/ucspi-vsock

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).